![]() ![]() it isn't like anyone was thinking they could have cashed in on the books popularity, the book is from the 50's, i am sure no one was expecting or necessarily wanting another adaptation of it. By Michael Boyle / J5:03 pm EDT A lot of the best horror movies of all time were ones that were deeply unfaithful to the book. The studio insisted on a replacement happy ending, which implies the discovery of a cure and nothing of the zombies’ humanity. not even on a level of "this character is supposed to be a redhead" or "his house wasn't described like that" but how did they just miss the core plot of the story in general and everything encompassing it? to a point where if they just changed the title and Robert Nevilles name they would have had an entirely different property. In Richard Matheson ’s novel I Am Legend, the dog dies because of the germ. by bennetthaselton TIL in the originally filmed ending of I Am Legend, Will Smith realizes he is the monster and the zombies have only been protecting themselves from him. but i just cant wrap my head around how they got everything so wrong. RICHARD MATHESON I Am Legend PART I: January 1976 Chapter One ON THOSE CLOUDY DAYS, Robert Neville was never sure when sunset came, and sometimes they were in the streets before he could get back. ![]() ![]() For anyone that has read Richard Matheson's classic novel, i am sure that my question is pretty obvious with the differences between the novel and the film. Neville apologizes and the lead 'monster' gives him some roars and facial expressions that make it appear that he's caught between being angry at Neville and wanting to thank him or talk to him about how much pain he's caused them and why, but ultimately leaves in peace and silence, carrying away the patient he'd come to rescue from Neville. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |